Google is an economic force to be reckoned with here in the Bay Area – and especially in Silicon Valley. The Internet pioneer employs more than 20,000 people, and they would seem to be among the happiest employees on earth.
The company’s latest news to hit the streets: it has jumped into real estate.
This news, however, is probably not what you’d expect. Google did not release an all-encompassing super-powered Internet search experience for home listings. Rather, the Mountain View-based giant is creating an $86-million Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) fund that will subsidize the construction and operation of 480 affordable rental units in seven communities in the West and Midwest for seniors and low-income families.
Google must have realized that there is no shortage of ways to help in the real estate arena offline. The fund apparently is not the first effort – Google recently invested in two other low-income housing projects for seniors in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles County.
So far, none of the projects have been in Google’s backyard in Mountain View, but it’s not really Google picking and choosing where the money goes. For that, they rely on the fund manager.
It’s nice to see philanthropic efforts by major U.S. corporations hit home like this. Affordable housing indeed is a problem in many areas and may get worse if the economy continues to disappoint.
Google’s investment comes at a time when many developers of low-income housing projects face huge financial hurdles and lack of funds. It is unusual for a technology company to fund projects like this. This move shows how the investor base for affordable housing is expanding beyond traditional means like banks.
It will be really interesting to see whether other large companies follow suit. As I mentioned, there are certainly a lot of projects needing funding and affordable housing is a social issue that is easy to get behind.
By Gino Blefari
President & CEO
Intero Real Estate Services, Inc.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
BELIEVE
If there’s one thing I’ve seen over and over again, it’s the cycle where housing soars, corrects, and then soars again.
In its low periods, like today, many, many people think real estate values will never come back. And certainly they’ll never go up again like they did in the past.
I don’t know about other parts of the country, but this is California where the American Dream thrives. I am eternally optimistic about California housing values, and most optimistic about values in the Bay Area.
So, I’ve collected some quotes from the past where people say real estate is dead. Reading them might allay some peoples’ concerns and put things into perspective. Enjoy:
“The prices of houses seem to have reached a plateau, and there is reasonable expectancy that prices will decline.” (Time, Dec. 1, 1947)
“Houses cost too much for the mass market. Today’s average price is around $8,000—out of reach for two-thirds of all buyers.” (Science Digest, April, 1948)
“If you bought your house since the War…you have made your deal at the top of the market… The days when you couldn’t lose on a home purchase are no longer with us.” (House Beautiful, Nov. 2, 1948)
“The goal of owning a home seems to be getting beyond the reach of more and more Americans. The typical new house today costs $28,000.” (Business Week, Sept. 4, 1969)
“Be suspicious of the ‘common wisdom’ that tells you to ‘Buy now…because continuing inflation will force home prices and rents higher and higher.’” (NEA Journal, Dec. 1970)
“The median price of a home today is approaching $50,000….Housing experts predict that in the future price rises won’t be that great.” (Nations Business, June, 1977)
“The era of easy profits in real estate may be drawing to a close.” (Money, Jan. 1981)
“In California… for example, it is not unusual to find families of average means buying $100,000 houses…. I’m confident prices have passed their peak.” (John Wesley English, The Coming Real Estate Crash, 1980)
“The golden-age of risk-free run-ups in home prices is gone.” (Money, March 1985)
“If you’re looking to buy, be careful. Rising home values are not a sure thing anymore.” (Miami Herald, Oct. 25, 1985)
“Most economists agree… [a home] will become little more than a roof and a tax deduction, certainly not the lucrative investment it was through much of the 1980s.” (Money, 1986)
“We’re starting to go back to the time when you bought a home not for its potential money-making abilities, but rather as a nesting spot.” (Los Angeles Times, Jan. 31, 1993)
“A home is where the bad investment is.” (San Francisco Examiner, November 17, 1996)
Things look grim right now, but go back and look at the dates on all these quotes? Anyone who followed the advice of these people would have missed out on one of the great real estate booms of all time.
What if you paid attention to the advice in quote #7? You’d have missed out on all that growth in the 1980’s.
What about quote #12? If you followed that advice, you’d have missed out on all the great years up until last year.
I could go on and on. If you’re a patient person, it’s been almost impossible not to get rich on California housing.
It happened before and it will happen again.
Don’t bet against California housing.
In the long run, it’s always been a great investment.
BY: Rick Soukoulis
Chairman and CEO
The Loan Source
408.578.8700
rsoukoulis@Interomortgage.com
In its low periods, like today, many, many people think real estate values will never come back. And certainly they’ll never go up again like they did in the past.
I don’t know about other parts of the country, but this is California where the American Dream thrives. I am eternally optimistic about California housing values, and most optimistic about values in the Bay Area.
So, I’ve collected some quotes from the past where people say real estate is dead. Reading them might allay some peoples’ concerns and put things into perspective. Enjoy:
“The prices of houses seem to have reached a plateau, and there is reasonable expectancy that prices will decline.” (Time, Dec. 1, 1947)
“Houses cost too much for the mass market. Today’s average price is around $8,000—out of reach for two-thirds of all buyers.” (Science Digest, April, 1948)
“If you bought your house since the War…you have made your deal at the top of the market… The days when you couldn’t lose on a home purchase are no longer with us.” (House Beautiful, Nov. 2, 1948)
“The goal of owning a home seems to be getting beyond the reach of more and more Americans. The typical new house today costs $28,000.” (Business Week, Sept. 4, 1969)
“Be suspicious of the ‘common wisdom’ that tells you to ‘Buy now…because continuing inflation will force home prices and rents higher and higher.’” (NEA Journal, Dec. 1970)
“The median price of a home today is approaching $50,000….Housing experts predict that in the future price rises won’t be that great.” (Nations Business, June, 1977)
“The era of easy profits in real estate may be drawing to a close.” (Money, Jan. 1981)
“In California… for example, it is not unusual to find families of average means buying $100,000 houses…. I’m confident prices have passed their peak.” (John Wesley English, The Coming Real Estate Crash, 1980)
“The golden-age of risk-free run-ups in home prices is gone.” (Money, March 1985)
“If you’re looking to buy, be careful. Rising home values are not a sure thing anymore.” (Miami Herald, Oct. 25, 1985)
“Most economists agree… [a home] will become little more than a roof and a tax deduction, certainly not the lucrative investment it was through much of the 1980s.” (Money, 1986)
“We’re starting to go back to the time when you bought a home not for its potential money-making abilities, but rather as a nesting spot.” (Los Angeles Times, Jan. 31, 1993)
“A home is where the bad investment is.” (San Francisco Examiner, November 17, 1996)
Things look grim right now, but go back and look at the dates on all these quotes? Anyone who followed the advice of these people would have missed out on one of the great real estate booms of all time.
What if you paid attention to the advice in quote #7? You’d have missed out on all that growth in the 1980’s.
What about quote #12? If you followed that advice, you’d have missed out on all the great years up until last year.
I could go on and on. If you’re a patient person, it’s been almost impossible not to get rich on California housing.
It happened before and it will happen again.
Don’t bet against California housing.
In the long run, it’s always been a great investment.
BY: Rick Soukoulis
Chairman and CEO
The Loan Source
408.578.8700
rsoukoulis@Interomortgage.com
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Selling Short? Keep Track of Everything
Selling Short? Keep Track of Everything
By Gino Blefari
President and CEO
Intero Real Estate Services, Inc.
It’s that time of year again. The Winter Holidays are behind us, we’ve cheered a new Super Bowl champion and exchanged boxes of chocolates for Valentine’s Day. That can only mean one thing: Tax Season is upon us.
When it comes to your home, there is plenty of documentation of which you need to keep track when it comes time to file your annual return. For those of you filing “standard” income tax returns, this is all fairly clear and straightforward.
With the current real estate climate, however, there are scores situations, like having lost a home to foreclosure, or staring personal bankruptcy in the face, in which many never thought they’d find themselves. Situations like these can make filing taxes a bit trickier.
There’s one circumstance in particular on which I’d like to focus today:
Short sales.
If you’ve gone through the short sale process (where you can no longer afford the payments on your home, but your lender allows you to sell the home at loss, rather than go through with foreclosure), then you know it’s long, it’s arduous, and it’s one in which things have the potential to be very murky.
When completing the reams and reams of paperwork required by your lender to complete the short sale process, it’s likely that you signed a promissory note, or other like document, granting the lender the right to take action against you to collect the deficient amount. This is pretty standard. It’s possible, though, that you also got a copy of a document with the heading 1099-C, which the lender has filed with the IRS, indicating that the unpaid portion of the loan has been canceled. This is a trigger for the IRS to assess taxes against the forgiven debt.
Wait. What?
“How is that possible?” you might ask. Good question. It doesn’t stand to reason that a lender can pursue you for unpaid debt and that the IRS can assess taxes, as well. Logic would dictate that one or the other is reasonable, but not both.
Keep copies of everything having to do with anything related to the transaction.
If you signed paperwork indicating that the lender can take collection action against you, but you’ve also received a 1099-C for the uncollected debt, you’ll have plenty of documented proof to show the IRS that you don’t owe taxes on that amount. Similarly, if there is nothing in your sale paperwork that gives the bank the right to collect the debt, nor is there any other reference to it, the 1099-C will serve as evidence should the bank, at some point, decide to take action against you.
They can’t have it both ways.
I’m not a tax professional. I’m not certified to give that sort of advice. But I can advise you to seek the counsel of a tax professional, so that negotiating the maze of tax ramifications that come with a short sale is made somewhat easier
By Gino Blefari
President and CEO
Intero Real Estate Services, Inc.
It’s that time of year again. The Winter Holidays are behind us, we’ve cheered a new Super Bowl champion and exchanged boxes of chocolates for Valentine’s Day. That can only mean one thing: Tax Season is upon us.
When it comes to your home, there is plenty of documentation of which you need to keep track when it comes time to file your annual return. For those of you filing “standard” income tax returns, this is all fairly clear and straightforward.
With the current real estate climate, however, there are scores situations, like having lost a home to foreclosure, or staring personal bankruptcy in the face, in which many never thought they’d find themselves. Situations like these can make filing taxes a bit trickier.
There’s one circumstance in particular on which I’d like to focus today:
Short sales.
If you’ve gone through the short sale process (where you can no longer afford the payments on your home, but your lender allows you to sell the home at loss, rather than go through with foreclosure), then you know it’s long, it’s arduous, and it’s one in which things have the potential to be very murky.
When completing the reams and reams of paperwork required by your lender to complete the short sale process, it’s likely that you signed a promissory note, or other like document, granting the lender the right to take action against you to collect the deficient amount. This is pretty standard. It’s possible, though, that you also got a copy of a document with the heading 1099-C, which the lender has filed with the IRS, indicating that the unpaid portion of the loan has been canceled. This is a trigger for the IRS to assess taxes against the forgiven debt.
Wait. What?
“How is that possible?” you might ask. Good question. It doesn’t stand to reason that a lender can pursue you for unpaid debt and that the IRS can assess taxes, as well. Logic would dictate that one or the other is reasonable, but not both.
Keep copies of everything having to do with anything related to the transaction.
If you signed paperwork indicating that the lender can take collection action against you, but you’ve also received a 1099-C for the uncollected debt, you’ll have plenty of documented proof to show the IRS that you don’t owe taxes on that amount. Similarly, if there is nothing in your sale paperwork that gives the bank the right to collect the debt, nor is there any other reference to it, the 1099-C will serve as evidence should the bank, at some point, decide to take action against you.
They can’t have it both ways.
I’m not a tax professional. I’m not certified to give that sort of advice. But I can advise you to seek the counsel of a tax professional, so that negotiating the maze of tax ramifications that come with a short sale is made somewhat easier
By Gino Blefari
President and CEO
Intero Real Estate Services, Inc.
It’s that time of year again. The Winter Holidays are behind us, we’ve cheered a new Super Bowl champion and exchanged boxes of chocolates for Valentine’s Day. That can only mean one thing: Tax Season is upon us.
When it comes to your home, there is plenty of documentation of which you need to keep track when it comes time to file your annual return. For those of you filing “standard” income tax returns, this is all fairly clear and straightforward.
With the current real estate climate, however, there are scores situations, like having lost a home to foreclosure, or staring personal bankruptcy in the face, in which many never thought they’d find themselves. Situations like these can make filing taxes a bit trickier.
There’s one circumstance in particular on which I’d like to focus today:
Short sales.
If you’ve gone through the short sale process (where you can no longer afford the payments on your home, but your lender allows you to sell the home at loss, rather than go through with foreclosure), then you know it’s long, it’s arduous, and it’s one in which things have the potential to be very murky.
When completing the reams and reams of paperwork required by your lender to complete the short sale process, it’s likely that you signed a promissory note, or other like document, granting the lender the right to take action against you to collect the deficient amount. This is pretty standard. It’s possible, though, that you also got a copy of a document with the heading 1099-C, which the lender has filed with the IRS, indicating that the unpaid portion of the loan has been canceled. This is a trigger for the IRS to assess taxes against the forgiven debt.
Wait. What?
“How is that possible?” you might ask. Good question. It doesn’t stand to reason that a lender can pursue you for unpaid debt and that the IRS can assess taxes, as well. Logic would dictate that one or the other is reasonable, but not both.
Keep copies of everything having to do with anything related to the transaction.
If you signed paperwork indicating that the lender can take collection action against you, but you’ve also received a 1099-C for the uncollected debt, you’ll have plenty of documented proof to show the IRS that you don’t owe taxes on that amount. Similarly, if there is nothing in your sale paperwork that gives the bank the right to collect the debt, nor is there any other reference to it, the 1099-C will serve as evidence should the bank, at some point, decide to take action against you.
They can’t have it both ways.
I’m not a tax professional. I’m not certified to give that sort of advice. But I can advise you to seek the counsel of a tax professional, so that negotiating the maze of tax ramifications that come with a short sale is made somewhat easier
By Gino Blefari
President and CEO
Intero Real Estate Services, Inc.
It’s that time of year again. The Winter Holidays are behind us, we’ve cheered a new Super Bowl champion and exchanged boxes of chocolates for Valentine’s Day. That can only mean one thing: Tax Season is upon us.
When it comes to your home, there is plenty of documentation of which you need to keep track when it comes time to file your annual return. For those of you filing “standard” income tax returns, this is all fairly clear and straightforward.
With the current real estate climate, however, there are scores situations, like having lost a home to foreclosure, or staring personal bankruptcy in the face, in which many never thought they’d find themselves. Situations like these can make filing taxes a bit trickier.
There’s one circumstance in particular on which I’d like to focus today:
Short sales.
If you’ve gone through the short sale process (where you can no longer afford the payments on your home, but your lender allows you to sell the home at loss, rather than go through with foreclosure), then you know it’s long, it’s arduous, and it’s one in which things have the potential to be very murky.
When completing the reams and reams of paperwork required by your lender to complete the short sale process, it’s likely that you signed a promissory note, or other like document, granting the lender the right to take action against you to collect the deficient amount. This is pretty standard. It’s possible, though, that you also got a copy of a document with the heading 1099-C, which the lender has filed with the IRS, indicating that the unpaid portion of the loan has been canceled. This is a trigger for the IRS to assess taxes against the forgiven debt.
Wait. What?
“How is that possible?” you might ask. Good question. It doesn’t stand to reason that a lender can pursue you for unpaid debt and that the IRS can assess taxes, as well. Logic would dictate that one or the other is reasonable, but not both.
Keep copies of everything having to do with anything related to the transaction.
If you signed paperwork indicating that the lender can take collection action against you, but you’ve also received a 1099-C for the uncollected debt, you’ll have plenty of documented proof to show the IRS that you don’t owe taxes on that amount. Similarly, if there is nothing in your sale paperwork that gives the bank the right to collect the debt, nor is there any other reference to it, the 1099-C will serve as evidence should the bank, at some point, decide to take action against you.
They can’t have it both ways.
I’m not a tax professional. I’m not certified to give that sort of advice. But I can advise you to seek the counsel of a tax professional, so that negotiating the maze of tax ramifications that come with a short sale is made somewhat easier
Thursday, November 12, 2009
The (Not Just) First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
The (Not Just) First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit, Expanded & Explained
By Gino Blefari
President and CEO, Intero Real Estate Services
After much speculation by the general populace (and the real estate industry) and much consternation by Congress, the much-anticipated extension of the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit has been passed.
Passed, not to mention greatly expanded.
Whether you’re in favor of or opposed to the credit, it’s now been made available to a host of Americans not included in the initial offering, so how can you take advantage of it? Let’s break it down, shall we?
The original tax credit, which was a part of the economic stimulus package put into effect in February 2009, was made available to first-time homebuyers (people who hadn’t owned a home for three or more years) and applied to home purchases that closed on or before November 30, 2009. With the passage of the expansion bill into law, that credit has been extended to purchases made by May 1, 2010 and that are closed prior to July 1, 2010 (that means escrow is closed, all papers signed and keys are in-hand on or before June 30th).
For first-time homebuyers, the credit amount, as it was in the original plan, remains at 10% of the purchase price, up to a maximum credit of $8,000. Originally, to be eligible for the credit, single (not married) purchasers could have an adjusted gross income (AGI) of no more than $75,000/year; married couples with an AGI of $150,000 or less were eligible. Under the new plan, singles with an AGI of up to $125,000 and married couples with an AGI of up to $225,000 are eligible.
For those of you who had previously been ineligible to claim the credit at all because you already owned a home, there may be good news for you. Under the new plan, homeowners who have lived in their homes for 5 consecutive years of the past 8 years are eligible to receive a credit toward a new home purchase. Meant to give a boost to “move-up” buyers, this credit amount can be 10% of the purchase price, up to $6,500. The income caps referenced above are the same.
If you’re a member of the Armed Services and were/will be deployed outside the United States for at least 90 days between December 31, 2008 - May 1, 2010, you may claim the credit until May 1, 2011 (with settlement all wrapped up before July 1, 2011).
One peculiarity of which it’s important to take note: even if you purchase a new home in 2010, you can claim the credit on your 2009 tax return. If you file for an extension of time to file your income taxes, or if you amend your already-filed 2009 tax return, you may include the tax credit (this would put the cash in your pocket much sooner than if you were to claim the credit on your 2010 tax return). Be sure, however, to take heed of the income limitations, as they apply to the year in which you claim the credit.
Finally, it’s important that you understand that if the purchase price of the home exceeds $800,000, no tax credit may be claimed, regardless of your income levels. The credit only applies to primary residences. Investment properties or vacation homes don’t qualify.
Whether the expansion and extension of this credit is the shot in the arm that the US Economy needs remains to be seen, but it’s here, it’s ready and, if you’re planning on purchasing a new home, you should most certainly take advantage of it. Talk to your Intero agent or consult your financial advisor to discuss how this affects YOU.
By Gino Blefari
President and CEO, Intero Real Estate Services
After much speculation by the general populace (and the real estate industry) and much consternation by Congress, the much-anticipated extension of the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit has been passed.
Passed, not to mention greatly expanded.
Whether you’re in favor of or opposed to the credit, it’s now been made available to a host of Americans not included in the initial offering, so how can you take advantage of it? Let’s break it down, shall we?
The original tax credit, which was a part of the economic stimulus package put into effect in February 2009, was made available to first-time homebuyers (people who hadn’t owned a home for three or more years) and applied to home purchases that closed on or before November 30, 2009. With the passage of the expansion bill into law, that credit has been extended to purchases made by May 1, 2010 and that are closed prior to July 1, 2010 (that means escrow is closed, all papers signed and keys are in-hand on or before June 30th).
For first-time homebuyers, the credit amount, as it was in the original plan, remains at 10% of the purchase price, up to a maximum credit of $8,000. Originally, to be eligible for the credit, single (not married) purchasers could have an adjusted gross income (AGI) of no more than $75,000/year; married couples with an AGI of $150,000 or less were eligible. Under the new plan, singles with an AGI of up to $125,000 and married couples with an AGI of up to $225,000 are eligible.
For those of you who had previously been ineligible to claim the credit at all because you already owned a home, there may be good news for you. Under the new plan, homeowners who have lived in their homes for 5 consecutive years of the past 8 years are eligible to receive a credit toward a new home purchase. Meant to give a boost to “move-up” buyers, this credit amount can be 10% of the purchase price, up to $6,500. The income caps referenced above are the same.
If you’re a member of the Armed Services and were/will be deployed outside the United States for at least 90 days between December 31, 2008 - May 1, 2010, you may claim the credit until May 1, 2011 (with settlement all wrapped up before July 1, 2011).
One peculiarity of which it’s important to take note: even if you purchase a new home in 2010, you can claim the credit on your 2009 tax return. If you file for an extension of time to file your income taxes, or if you amend your already-filed 2009 tax return, you may include the tax credit (this would put the cash in your pocket much sooner than if you were to claim the credit on your 2010 tax return). Be sure, however, to take heed of the income limitations, as they apply to the year in which you claim the credit.
Finally, it’s important that you understand that if the purchase price of the home exceeds $800,000, no tax credit may be claimed, regardless of your income levels. The credit only applies to primary residences. Investment properties or vacation homes don’t qualify.
Whether the expansion and extension of this credit is the shot in the arm that the US Economy needs remains to be seen, but it’s here, it’s ready and, if you’re planning on purchasing a new home, you should most certainly take advantage of it. Talk to your Intero agent or consult your financial advisor to discuss how this affects YOU.
Friday, November 6, 2009
CONGRESS PASSES HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT
Here's the latest intelligence from Real Estate Economy Watch.
Special Report
CONGRESS PASSES HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly this afternoon to pass legislation containing an extension and expansion of the homebuyer tax credit, completing Congressional action and sending the tax credit to President Obama for his signature, possibly as early as tomorrow.
The $8,000 homebuyer tax credit for first-time buyers, due to expire in 25 days, will be extended through April 30 of next year and buyers will have an additional two months, until the end of June, to close. First-time buyers who are in process of making a purchase will no longer need to worry about qualifying for the $8,000 credit if they close after the November 30 deadline. The new legislation increases the income limit for couples with income up to $225,000, a nearly $55,000 increase above the level in existing law.
For the first time, the new legislation makes buyers who already own a home eligible for a credit. A $6,500 maximum credit will be available to existing homeowners who have lived in their current residence for five of the prior eight years. The legislation limits eligibility for the existing homeowner credit to homes worth $800,000 or less.
Read the full story at http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/
Special Report
CONGRESS PASSES HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly this afternoon to pass legislation containing an extension and expansion of the homebuyer tax credit, completing Congressional action and sending the tax credit to President Obama for his signature, possibly as early as tomorrow.
The $8,000 homebuyer tax credit for first-time buyers, due to expire in 25 days, will be extended through April 30 of next year and buyers will have an additional two months, until the end of June, to close. First-time buyers who are in process of making a purchase will no longer need to worry about qualifying for the $8,000 credit if they close after the November 30 deadline. The new legislation increases the income limit for couples with income up to $225,000, a nearly $55,000 increase above the level in existing law.
For the first time, the new legislation makes buyers who already own a home eligible for a credit. A $6,500 maximum credit will be available to existing homeowners who have lived in their current residence for five of the prior eight years. The legislation limits eligibility for the existing homeowner credit to homes worth $800,000 or less.
Read the full story at http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)