Showing posts with label housing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label housing. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Lending Gets Even Tighter for Borrowers
The average FICO score for first-lien loans reached 750 in October, a rise from 741 in August, according to Ellie Mae, an analysis that encompasses about 20 percent of all loan applications in the U.S.
Meanwhile, the average FICO score on applications that were denied by lenders was 706. That is up from 700 compared to year ago levels and 697 in September 2011.
Last week, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said that tighter lending conditions are contributing to a housing slowdown. He said that some tightening in mortgage lending was necessary following the housing crisis. But, he added, “it seems at this point the pendulum has swung too far the other way, and that overly tight lending standards may now be preventing creditworthy borrowers from buying homes."
Source: “Average FICO Score Getting higher for Approved Mortgages,” HousingWire (Nov. 19. 2012)
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
The Market is Competitive for Home Buyers
More home buyers are finding they’re losing their power position in the real estate market and that when they submit an offer for a home, they are not alone in the bidding. In fact, buyers who submit low offers may not even get a courtesy of a callback nowadays.
Money Magazine recently offered potential buyers the following tips if they want to get the winning bid on a home:
Get pre-approved, not prequalified: Pre-approval for a loan based on a buyer's credit, income, and assets is viewed as better than getting pre-qualified, which is just an estimate of how much that buyer may be able to borrow.
Find an experienced REALTOR®: Money Magazine advised home buyers to find a real estate professional who knows how to handle multiple-offer situations and can advise how much to offer and help buyers determine if they’re getting a home at a fair price.
Watch the contingencies: “The best offer isn't always the one with the best price," says George Miller, a Sarasota, Fla., real estate agent. Buyers who put in too many contingencies with their offer may lose out.
Source: “Winning in a Seller's Housing Market,” Money Magazine (Sept. 12, 2012)
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
The Homeowner Tax Credit– What It Is and Where It Is Headed
The Taxpayer Relief Act was a huge break for sellers of real estate back in 1997. Basically, Congress changed the tax laws so that a homeowner could exempt $250,000 in gains from the sale of the owner’s primary residence. This had outstanding tax benefits for sellers over the last ten years as properties seemed to exponentially increase in value and homeowners routinely sold homes for a profit. In fact, prior to the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, homeowners had little incentive to move out of their home into a smaller place because it would cost them too much money in capital gains tax.
However, the President and Congress have recently began hinting that they might roll back or repeal some of the tax benefits within The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. This talk stays somewhat under the radar because, presently, people are not routinely selling their homes for a profit. But my question is: “What happens when the market ticks up and this benefit is repealed or rolled back?” How will that affect our business?
The Taxpayer Relief Act
The rules are pretty simple and any good realtor should know them well. Essentially, a homeowner can sell a “primary residence” and keep the first $250,000 of profit tax free. If the homeowners are married and filing a joint tax return, the couple can keep the first $500,000 of profit tax free.
In order to be deemed a “primary residence” the home must 1) have been lived in by the seller for at least two of the last five years, 2) the seller and his/her spouse must not have collected this tax benefit within the last two years on a different home sale, and 3) the property must be residential (commercial properties are not eligible for this tax exemption). The seller need not have lived in the home for two consecutive years. Also, as long as a seller has not sold a “primary home” and taken this tax benefit within the last two years, the tax exemption can be claimed over and over again.
The rules were made more lenient in 2004 for sellers who have been deployed by the military, have had a major change in health, have been forced to move for work, or can demonstrate insurmountable hardship. In these special circumstances, the sellers do not have to show that they lived in the primary residence for two of the last five years. However, they still cannot collect the benefit if they already have done so on a different sale within the last two years.
The Proposed Change
Most business attorneys are aware that the current capital gains tax that individuals and businesses pay on “personal property” sales will rise in 2011 because of a “sunset provision” that was placed in the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2006. This means that the Act terminates on its own on January 1, 2011, and without an additional act of Congress, individuals and businesses will have to pay higher taxes on profits that they earn for selling certain assets next year. Generally, real estate sales are not included in this capital gains tax increase. However, as the debate has heated up about whether to save the current “personal property” capital gains tax rate, the President and many in Congress have taken a firm stand that they want “fairness” in tax paying. This has lead to a discussion about revisiting the capital gains tax structure, including a tax increase on the profits that individuals earn when they sell their real estate holdings.
In his 2008 debates with Hilary Clinton, then Senator Obama proposed changing the entire capital gains tax structure back to where it was prior to The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. This would have numerous affects. Most notably, the homeowner tax benefit would be rolled back and virtually eliminated. Prior to 1997, sellers were only entitled to a $125,000 capital gains credit – and that was only if the seller was 55 years old or older at the time of sale.
Some on Capitol Hill have recently argued that the homeowner tax credit should be reduced from a $250,000 credit for one seller and a $500,000 credit for married sellers to a blanket $125,000 credit regardless of whether the couple files jointly or separately. The White House has not taken an official stand since Mr. Obama became President. However, some notable leaders in Congress, including Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Barney Frank and Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (both voted against the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997), have recently suggested that the homeowner tax credit of 1997 should be on the table along with all other capital gains.
By Chris Moles
Brokerage Counsel
Intero Real Estate, Inc.
However, the President and Congress have recently began hinting that they might roll back or repeal some of the tax benefits within The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. This talk stays somewhat under the radar because, presently, people are not routinely selling their homes for a profit. But my question is: “What happens when the market ticks up and this benefit is repealed or rolled back?” How will that affect our business?
The Taxpayer Relief Act
The rules are pretty simple and any good realtor should know them well. Essentially, a homeowner can sell a “primary residence” and keep the first $250,000 of profit tax free. If the homeowners are married and filing a joint tax return, the couple can keep the first $500,000 of profit tax free.
In order to be deemed a “primary residence” the home must 1) have been lived in by the seller for at least two of the last five years, 2) the seller and his/her spouse must not have collected this tax benefit within the last two years on a different home sale, and 3) the property must be residential (commercial properties are not eligible for this tax exemption). The seller need not have lived in the home for two consecutive years. Also, as long as a seller has not sold a “primary home” and taken this tax benefit within the last two years, the tax exemption can be claimed over and over again.
The rules were made more lenient in 2004 for sellers who have been deployed by the military, have had a major change in health, have been forced to move for work, or can demonstrate insurmountable hardship. In these special circumstances, the sellers do not have to show that they lived in the primary residence for two of the last five years. However, they still cannot collect the benefit if they already have done so on a different sale within the last two years.
The Proposed Change
Most business attorneys are aware that the current capital gains tax that individuals and businesses pay on “personal property” sales will rise in 2011 because of a “sunset provision” that was placed in the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2006. This means that the Act terminates on its own on January 1, 2011, and without an additional act of Congress, individuals and businesses will have to pay higher taxes on profits that they earn for selling certain assets next year. Generally, real estate sales are not included in this capital gains tax increase. However, as the debate has heated up about whether to save the current “personal property” capital gains tax rate, the President and many in Congress have taken a firm stand that they want “fairness” in tax paying. This has lead to a discussion about revisiting the capital gains tax structure, including a tax increase on the profits that individuals earn when they sell their real estate holdings.
In his 2008 debates with Hilary Clinton, then Senator Obama proposed changing the entire capital gains tax structure back to where it was prior to The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. This would have numerous affects. Most notably, the homeowner tax benefit would be rolled back and virtually eliminated. Prior to 1997, sellers were only entitled to a $125,000 capital gains credit – and that was only if the seller was 55 years old or older at the time of sale.
Some on Capitol Hill have recently argued that the homeowner tax credit should be reduced from a $250,000 credit for one seller and a $500,000 credit for married sellers to a blanket $125,000 credit regardless of whether the couple files jointly or separately. The White House has not taken an official stand since Mr. Obama became President. However, some notable leaders in Congress, including Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Barney Frank and Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (both voted against the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997), have recently suggested that the homeowner tax credit of 1997 should be on the table along with all other capital gains.
By Chris Moles
Brokerage Counsel
Intero Real Estate, Inc.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Google Says Hello to Real Estate
Google is an economic force to be reckoned with here in the Bay Area – and especially in Silicon Valley. The Internet pioneer employs more than 20,000 people, and they would seem to be among the happiest employees on earth.
The company’s latest news to hit the streets: it has jumped into real estate.
This news, however, is probably not what you’d expect. Google did not release an all-encompassing super-powered Internet search experience for home listings. Rather, the Mountain View-based giant is creating an $86-million Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) fund that will subsidize the construction and operation of 480 affordable rental units in seven communities in the West and Midwest for seniors and low-income families.
Google must have realized that there is no shortage of ways to help in the real estate arena offline. The fund apparently is not the first effort – Google recently invested in two other low-income housing projects for seniors in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles County.
So far, none of the projects have been in Google’s backyard in Mountain View, but it’s not really Google picking and choosing where the money goes. For that, they rely on the fund manager.
It’s nice to see philanthropic efforts by major U.S. corporations hit home like this. Affordable housing indeed is a problem in many areas and may get worse if the economy continues to disappoint.
Google’s investment comes at a time when many developers of low-income housing projects face huge financial hurdles and lack of funds. It is unusual for a technology company to fund projects like this. This move shows how the investor base for affordable housing is expanding beyond traditional means like banks.
It will be really interesting to see whether other large companies follow suit. As I mentioned, there are certainly a lot of projects needing funding and affordable housing is a social issue that is easy to get behind.
By Gino Blefari
President & CEO
Intero Real Estate Services, Inc.
The company’s latest news to hit the streets: it has jumped into real estate.
This news, however, is probably not what you’d expect. Google did not release an all-encompassing super-powered Internet search experience for home listings. Rather, the Mountain View-based giant is creating an $86-million Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) fund that will subsidize the construction and operation of 480 affordable rental units in seven communities in the West and Midwest for seniors and low-income families.
Google must have realized that there is no shortage of ways to help in the real estate arena offline. The fund apparently is not the first effort – Google recently invested in two other low-income housing projects for seniors in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles County.
So far, none of the projects have been in Google’s backyard in Mountain View, but it’s not really Google picking and choosing where the money goes. For that, they rely on the fund manager.
It’s nice to see philanthropic efforts by major U.S. corporations hit home like this. Affordable housing indeed is a problem in many areas and may get worse if the economy continues to disappoint.
Google’s investment comes at a time when many developers of low-income housing projects face huge financial hurdles and lack of funds. It is unusual for a technology company to fund projects like this. This move shows how the investor base for affordable housing is expanding beyond traditional means like banks.
It will be really interesting to see whether other large companies follow suit. As I mentioned, there are certainly a lot of projects needing funding and affordable housing is a social issue that is easy to get behind.
By Gino Blefari
President & CEO
Intero Real Estate Services, Inc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)